Table 6. DPPH radical scavenging activity of QSLE, LJLE, and CTLE extracted under different conditions

Temperature(℃) Extraction time (h) DPPH radical scavenging activity (%)
QSLE1) LJLE2) CTLE3)
70 1 38.61±1.34abc4)A5) 13.93±0.40hB 5.37±0.28gC
2 37.45±4.18abcA 15.08±0.05gB 5.45±0.41fgC
3 39.92±3.07abcA 14.93±0.33ghB 5.75±0.31fgC
4 30.65±4.88abcA 16.79±0.00eB 5.92±0.10eC
5 30.21±1.73bcA 16.65±0.13efB 7.12±0.10efC
80 1 28.70±1.29cA 14.41±0.18bB 7.32±0.35dC
2 31.73±2.86abcA 15.72±0.05fB 7.12±0.10dC
3 43.39±1.96aA 16.16±0.10efB 7.23±0.27dB
4 34.67±2.30abcA 19.34±0.45bB 8.87±0.10dC
5 36.07±7.41abcA 17.64±0.13dB 8.87±0.10cC
90 1 35.84±2.00abcA 18.66±0.35bB 10.00±0.43cC
2 35.58±6.68abcA 18.69±0.10bcB 10.00±0.43bC
3 36.80±13.53abcA 18.17±0.20cdB 10.38±0.10bB
4 38.09±1.64abcA 20.30±0.55aB 11.20±0.09aC
5 43.02±2.13abA 19.16±0.93bB 11.23±0.05aC
1)QSLE, Quercus salicina Blume leaf hot water extract.
2)LJLE, Ligustrum japonicum leaf hot water extract.
3)CTLE, Clerodendrum trichotomum leaf hot water extract.
4)a-hMeans with the same superscripts in a column are not significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05).
5)A-CMeans with the same superscripts in a row are not significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05).