Table 7. ABTS radical scavenging activity of QSLE, LJLE, and CTLE extracted under different conditions

Temperature(℃) Extraction time (h) ABTS radical scavening activity (%)
QSLE1) LJLE2) CTLE3)
70 1 28.28±0.03a4)A5) 17.31±0.27jB 12.17±1.41hC
2 28.11±0.12aA 18.61±0.22iB 14.31±0.38fgC
3 27.72±0.10bA 19.36±0.32hB 14.41±0.15fgC
4 27.58±0.03bcA 20.11±0.27gB 14.52±0.38fC
5 27.41±0.11bcA 20.38±0.22gB 14.45±0.24fgC
80 1 27.43±0.13bcA 20.72±0.27fB 13.97±0.22gC
2 27.33±0.11cA 21.00±0.16eB 14.62±0.57fC
3 26.87±0.20deA 22.73±0.45dB 15.23±0.31eC
4 26.55±0.17deA 22.97±0.28dB 15.51±0.16eC
5 26.12±0.17fA 22.56±0.22dB 15.54±0.15eC
90 1 27.18±0.20deA 22.53±0.27dB 17.31±0.22dC
2 26.58±0.17eA 23.79±0.16cB 18.68±0.66cC
3 26.92±0.43deA 24.30±0.20bB 20.31±0.51bC
4 26.44±0.11efA 25.29±0.16aB 20.38±0.22bC
5 26.08±0.17fA 25.36±0.15aB 21.47±0.43aC
1)QSLE, Quercus salicina Blume leaf hot water extract.
2)LJLE, Ligustrum japonicum leaf hot water extract.
3)CTLE, Clerodendrum trichotomum leaf hot water extract.
4)a-jMeans with the same superscripts in a column are not significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05).
5)A-CMeans with the same superscripts in a row are not significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test (p<0.05).