Table 2. Changes in amino-N content (%) of squid ‘Sikhae’ made with barley flour by high hydrostatic pressure treatment during storage at 10°C
Sample1) | Storage period (day) |
0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 |
NM | 0.18±0.02Ac2) | 0.19±0.02Ac | 0.26±0.01Ab | 0.36±0.01Ab | 0.39±0.01Aa | 0.40±0.01Aa | 0.41±0.01ABa |
NB | 0.18±0.05Ae | 0.18±0.01Ae | 0.25±0.01ABd | 0.31±0.00Bc | 0.35±0.00Bc | 0.38±0.01Aab | 0.43±0.06Aa |
HM | 0.16±0.02Ae | 0.19±0.02Ad | 0.23±0.02BCc | 0.29±0.02Bb | 0.28±0.01Db | 0.36±0.01Ba | 0.36±0.01Ba |
HB | 0.16±0.01Ae | 0.21±0.02Ad | 0.22±0.02Cd | 0.27±0.01Cc | 0.32±0.01Cb | 0.35±0.01Ba | 0.36±0.00Ba |
NM, squid ‘Sikhae’ made with glutinous foxtail millet; NB, squid ‘Sikhae’ made with glutinous barley; HM, squid Sikhae made with glutinous foxtail millet by high hydrostatic pressure treatment; HB, squid ‘Sikhae’ made with glutinous barley by high hydrostatic pressure treatment.
Values are mean±SD (n=3). A-DMeans in a column and a-emeans in a row followed by different superscripts are significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test respectively (p<0.05).