Table 5. Quantitative descriptive analysis results of sulgidduk added with different ratios of galangal powder
QDA | Sulgidduk added with galangal powder | F-value |
Control1) | 2% | 4% | 6% | 8% |
Brown color2) | 1.33±1.143)e | 4.13±1.45d4) | 5.28±1.26c | 6.63±1.41b | 7.43±1.26a | 133.34***5) |
Tenderness | 3.75±2.15d | 4.68±1.64c | 4.78±1.70bc | 6.05±1.52a | 5.55±1.90ab | 9.69*** |
Moisture | 6.75±1.63a | 5.63±1.55b | 4.68±1.82c | 3.53±2.05d | 3.90±1.66d | 22.49*** |
Specific odor | 3.20±2.21c | 3.78±1.76c | 5.73±1.91b | 6.00±1.96b | 7.60±1.41a | 36.34***. |
Sweet taste | 5.63±1.89a | 5.05±1.43ab | 4.23±1.73c | 4.53±1.54bc | 3.95±1.85c | 6.22*** |
Bitter taste | 1.80±1.65d | 3.30±1.90c | 4.73±2.00b | 5.78±2.14a | 6.20±2.36a | 32.25*** |
Not added with galangal powder.
1 weak ↔ 9 strong.
All values are means±SD (n=40).
Means with the different superscript letters in the same row are significantly different by the Duncan’s multiple range test at p<0.05.
***Significant at p<0.001.