Table 3. Comparison of biotin content in meats using different extraction methods
Samples | | Biotin (μg/100 g)1) |
Non-treated | Pepsin-assisted |
Meat | Beef, foreshank | 0.779±0.013b2) | 1.523±0.126a |
Beef, chuck | 0.944±0.012b | 1.038±0.015a |
Beef, shank | 0.977±0.005b | 1.101±0.028a |
Pork, ham | 0.632±0.028a | 0.796±0.053a |
Pork, tenderloin | 1.058±0.024a | 1.151±0.060a |
Chicken, leg | 1.094±0.013b | 1.979±0.087a |
Chicken, breast | 1.188±0.111a | 1.117±0.061a |
All values are mean±SD (n=3).
Different superscript letters (a,b) within a row of each same food group under biotin are significantly different by Duncan’s multiple range test at p<0.05.