Table 1. Changes in quality of farro according to liquefaction treatment conditions
Sample1) | PET | LTC (min) | F-value4) |
30 | 60 | 90 |
pH | 6.05±0.012)b3) | 6.09±0.02a | 5.93±0.01d | 5.96±0.01c | 92.045*** |
°Brix | 4.4±0.12c | 3.6±0.21d | 9.7±0.47b | 12.6±0.12a | 758.830*** |
Hunter’ color value | L | 53.6±0.46a | 49.1±0.49c | 50.1±1.37b | 49.3±0.36b | 21.731*** |
a | 2.8±0.12a | 2.6±0.15ab | 2.1±0.31d | 2.3±0.10c | 7.325* |
b | 23.1±0.26a | 23.2±0.31a | 22.9±0.60ab | 21.5±1.35b | 3.000 |
PET, pre-enzyme treatment; LTC, liquefaction enzyme treatment conditions; 30, liquefaction for 30 min; 60, liquefaction for 60 min; 90, liquefaction for 90 min.
All values are mean±SD (n=3).
Different superscript letters (a-c) in the same row indicate significant differences (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
The significance of each coefficient was detrmined using both the F-value (Fisher test value) and p-value (*Significant at p<0.1; **Significant at p<0.05; ***Significant at p<0.01).