Table 2. Changes in mineral content of farro according to liquefaction treatment conditions (mg/g)
Sample1) | PET | LTC (min) | F-value5) |
30 | 60 | 90 |
Ca | 0.074±0.0032)b3) | 0.085±0.007a | 0.089±0.004a | 0.087±0.001a | 6.569* |
Mg | 0.288±0.010b | 0.291±0.021b | 0.306±0.014ab | 0.323±0.004a | 4.413* |
K | 0.878±0.025 | 0.905±0.065 | 0.928±0.035 | 0.952±0.011 | 1.944 |
Fe | 0.008±0.001b | 0.008±0.001ab | 0.009±0.001a | 0.009±0.001a | 5.833* |
Zn | 0.008±0.001b | 0.009±0.001a | 0.010±0.001a | 0.010±0.0001a | 8.000** |
Se | ND4) | ND | ND | ND | - |
Total mineral content | 1.182±0.035b | 1.213±0.087ab | 1.254±0.050ab | 1.295±0.016a | 2.495 |
PET, pre-enzyme treatment; LTC, liquefaction enzyme treatment conditions; 30, liquefaction for 30 min; 60, liquefaction for 60 min; 90, liquefaction for 90 min.
All values are mean±SD (n=3).
Different superscript letters (a-c) in the same row indicate significant differences (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
ND, not detected.
The significance of each coefficient was detrmined using both the F-value (Fisher test value) and p-value (*Significant at p<0.1; **Significant at p<0.05; ***Significant at p<0.01).