Table 4. Changes in free sugar content of farro according to liquefaction treatment conditions (mg/g)
Sample1) | PET | LTC (min) | F-value4) |
30 | 60 | 90 |
Fructose | 8.75±0.902)a3) | 1.16±0.01d | 1.82±0.18c | 2.68±0.40b | 423.952*** |
Glucose | 18.78±0.63a | 4.46±0.13c | 4.14±0.29c | 6.27±0.51b | 761.000*** |
Maltose | 23.81±1.50d | 264.62±4.99c | 360.40±7.14a | 355.70±8.16b | 5,055.012*** |
Sucrose | 0.98±0.20a | 0.76±0.06b | 0.68±0.06b | 0.57±0.06b | 6.815* |
Total sugar content | 52.32±3.20d | 270.99±5.07c | 367.04±7.38a | 365.22±8.87b | 3,469.240*** |
PET, pre-enzyme treatment; LTC, liquefaction treatment conditions; 30, liquefaction for 30 min; 60, liquefaction for 60 min; 90, liquefaction for 90 min.
All values are mean±SD (n=3).
Different superscript letters (a-c) in the same row indicate significant differences (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
The significance of each coefficient was detrmined using both the F-value (Fisher test value) and p-value(*Significant at p<0.1; **Significant at p<0.05; ***Significant at p<0.01).