Food Science and Preservation
The Korean Society of Food Preservation
Research Article

Impact of room temperature on quality parameters and grading of eggs collected from the hens reared in battery cage systems

Maggonage Hasini Udeshika Maggonage1,https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5417-0457, Kuruppu Mudiyanselage Rasika Sandakelum1,https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6849-7573, Jeevunjee Zaffar2https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8971-386X, Edirisingha Dewage Nalaka Sandun Abeyrathne1,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6284-2145
1Department of Animal Science, Uva Wellassa University, Badulla 90000, Sri Lanka
2Switz Lanka Pvt. Ltd, Madurankuliya, Puttalam 61270, Sri Lanka
*Corresponding author Edirisingha Dewage Nalaka Sandun Abeyrathne, Tel: +94-552226580, E-mail: sandun@uwu.ac.lk

These authors contributed equally to this study.

Citation: Maggonage MHU, Sandakelum KMR, Zaffar J, Abeyrathne EDNS. Impact of room temperature on quality parameters and grading of eggs collected from the hens reared in battery cage systems. Food Sci. Preserv., 31(6), 947-956 (2024)

Copyright © The Korean Society of Food Preservation. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 05, 2024; Revised: Oct 29, 2024; Accepted: Nov 22, 2024

Published Online: Dec 31, 2024

Abstract

Although poultry eggs are naturally preserved protein sources, their quality is lost over storage. Egg storage is commonly practiced at ambient temperature in developing countries. The current experiment was focused on the determination of the shelf life of eggs at room temperature, considering variations in quality parameters over storage. 150 eggs from 28-week-old Hyline brown hens were stored (25°C±2) for 49 days, and variations of quality parameters (such as Haugh unit, yolk index and color, yolk and albumen percentages, weight loss percentages, and pH of yolk and albumen) were checked. ‘AA’ quality eggs gradually lost quality to ‘A’ at the end of four weeks (Haugh unit with 71.75±1.09, 66.93±2.83 on Days 21 and 28, respectively), and ‘B’ grade eggs were identified on Day 35 (Haugh unit; 55.26±2.76). During storage, parameters like weight loss percentage (0.46±0.06 on Day 3 to 9.49±1.32 on Day 49), yolk weight percentage (25.42%±1.76 on Day 1 to 30.99%±0.55 on Day 49), and pH of albumen (8.06±0.20 on Day 1 to 9.30±0.06 on day 49) had increased significantly (p<0.05). Albumen weight percentage and yolk index had decreased significantly (p<0.05), while no significant difference was identified in yolk color. Hence, stakeholders (producers, manufacturers, and consumers) can expect a satisfactory quality (grade A) of eggs that are stored at room temperature (25°C) even after 28 days from the day of laying.

Keywords: egg quality; haugh unit; egg grading; gemological microscopy; shelf life

1. Introduction

A poultry egg is a naturally preserved biological food item that is composed of a shell with four layers: shell membrane, mammillary knobs, palisade layer, and cuticle. The shell is a porous structure, and the pores are sealed partially with the proteinaceous cuticle, which allows permeability to gases while restricting the entry of micro-organisms to egg content (Belitz et al., 2009; Hunton, 2005). The shell membrane contains enzymes such as lysozyme and N-acetylglucosaminidase, which are considered bacteriolytic enzymes (Guha et al., 2019) that help ensure the natural protection of the egg. However, rapid deterioration of egg quality occurs during storage. The Freshness of an egg is the key characteristic that relates to its quality. Some studies discuss the possibility of bacterial entry soon after laying due to the presence of an immature cuticle for a short period (Miyamoto et al., 1998). In addition, changes in pH and water content of the yolk, changes in protein conformation, stretching and weakening of the vitelline membrane, and egg white thinning occur during the storage (Huang et al., 2012). Egg quality is mainly related to consumers’ acceptance. Other than the direct consumers of eggs, egg product manufacturers, such as producers who engage in producing albumen products, focus highly on the interior quality of eggs because

higher quality eggs assist in better component separation. Several parameters such as egg weight, freshness, cleanliness, Haugh unit (HU), yolk, and albumen indexes are used to measure the quality (Duman et al., 2016; Jones and Musgrove, 2005). These quality parameters are mainly divided into two general groups, such as internal (aspects related to air cell, yolk, and albumen) and external (shell shape, texture, and cleanliness) quality factors, which are used in the market to categorize the eggs into three grades as AA, A, and B. AA is considered the highest egg quality which decreases to A, and then to B with the time. The eggs below the B quality are inedible or loss (USDA, 2024a).

Other than grading, the shelf life of eggs in the market poses a critical concern. Storage temperature and humidity are two major factors that decide the shelf life of an egg. Based on records, eggs can be stored at 7°C (60% relative humidity) for 20 days, are not fit to consume after two weeks of storage at 37°C and should not be stored for more than one week where the ambient temperature rises to a level of 40°C (Kumari et al., 2020). According to the literature, storing eggs at room temperature was practiced in countries like India and Thailand at the market level, while further revealing the fact that 10% of consumers in Korea and 16% of consumers in Thailand and India had stored raw eggs at room temperature (Koppel et al., 2014). In addition, eggs are frequently stored at ambient temperature in retail markets of developing countries (Omana et al., 2011). Labeling the grade of eggs is common in markets to convey the quality. Size, weight, and grade description are considered important facts to be on the label for buyers (FAO, 2024). Therefore, pragmatic identification of variations that occur in quality parameters during storage of eggs at room temperature benefits direct consumers while purchasing and consuming. Apart from direct consumers, producers are also benefited since they are responsible for providing a safe and quality product to the market. Hence, the current study was designed to investigate the impact of the room temperature on the quality parameters of shell eggs under the ambient temperature (25°C±2) while discussing the deterioration of the grade during its shelf life.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Preparation of experimental units

A total of 150 newly laid eggs were collected from a commercial farm where 28-week-old Hyline brown hens were reared and fed under a battery cage system with a ration containing 17.60% (w/w) crude protein, 7.23% (w/w) fat, 4.18% (w/w) crude fiber, and 14.62% (w/w) ash. Eggs were transported to the General Laboratory of Animal Science department at Uva Wellassa University for further analysis. All the eggs were cleaned and subjected to a storage experiment on open molded plastic egg trays at room temperature (25°C±2) to observe the variation trends of quality parameters with the storage time.

2.2. Analytical methods
2.2.1. Test for Salmonella

The Salmonella detection test was conducted on day 01 according to the protocol introduced by Roberts and Greenwood (2003). Five cleaned eggs [cleaned with 70% (v/v) ethanol, wiped, and left to dry at room temperature] were cracked and added into five conical flasks, each of which contained 180 mL of buffered peptone water. The mixtures were homogenized and incubated for 18 h at 37°C. Incubated media was cultured on Xylose Lysine Deoxycholate (XLD) agar (HiMedia Laboratories, Maharashtra, India). Cultured plates were incubated for 18 h at 37°C and examined for typical Salmonella colonies.

2.2.2. Shape index

The shape index was measured based on the method suggested by Duman et al. (2016). The length (L) and width (W) of the egg were measured (Fig. 1) by using a Vernier caliper (147 6” digital caliper, General Tools and Instruments, Flusing, NY, USA). The following equation was used to calculate the shape index on day 01.

kjfp-31-6-947-g1
Fig. 1. Measurements of the egg (length L and width W) which were used to measure the shape index of the egg.
Download Original Figure
Shape index  =  Width   Length  × 100 %
(1)
2.2.3. Grading of eggs and Haugh unit

Eggs were graded according to the Egg Grading Manual of the United States Department of Agriculture (2000). The Haugh unit (HU) was calculated according to the method described by Stadelman and Cotterill (1995). Eggs were weighed, cracked, and poured gently onto the horizontal glass support. Albumen height (millimeter) was measured by using a spherometer (JD15160, Japson, Haryana, India) at predetermined time intervals.

Haugh unit  = 100 log H G 30 W 0.37 100 100 + 1.9
(2)

Air cell depth was measured by using a Vernier caliper (147 6” digital caliper, General Tools and Instruments) and a candler (PI-01, P&I, Zhejiang, China). Accordingly, eggs were graded throughout the storage period on scheduled time intervals (Day 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49) into AA, A, and B categories by considering the properties of the air cell, yolk, and albumen (Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of US standards for quality of individual shell eggs (USDA, 2024a)
Quality factor AAA A B
Air cell
  • - 1/8 inch (3.2 mm)

  • - Unlimited movement and free or bubbly

  • - 3/16 inch (4.8 mm)

  • - Unlimited movement and free or bubbly

  • - Over 3/16 inch

  • - Unlimited movement and free or bubbly

Yolk
  • - Outline slightly defined

  • - Practically free from defects

  • - Outline fairly well defined

  • - Practically free from defects

  • - Outline plainly visible

  • - Enlarge and flattened, no blood spots

Albumen
  • - Clear, firm (with respect to a broken out egg, Haugh unit value of ≥76, measured at 7.2°C and 15.6°C)

  • - Clear, reasonably firm (with respect to a broken out egg, Haugh unit value of 60 up to, measured at 7.2°C and 15.6°C)

  • - Weak and watery (with respect to a broken out egg, Haugh unit value lower than 60, measured at 7.2°C and 15.6°C)

  • - Blood and meat spots

Download Excel Table
2.2.4. Egg weight loss percentage

Egg weight loss percentage was measured according to Waimaleongora et al. (2009). The initial weight of the eggs was recorded on Day 1, and weight loss was computed on predefined time intervals (Days 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49) by using the following equation.

Egg weight loss  =  (Initial egg weight   Egg weight after storage)   Initial egg weight  × 100 %
(3)
2.2.5. Measuring variation trend of egg yolk and albumen
2.2.5.1. Yolk color

Yolk color was measured according to Sunder et al. (2022) by using a yolk color fan (A004, 2005-HMB, DSM, Switzerland). Yolk color was measured on established time intervals (Day 1, 3, 7, 10, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, and 49) throughout the storage time.

2.2.5.2. Yolk index

The yolk index was measured as per the method used by Li et al. (2017). Yolk diameter was measured across the center of the yolk by using a Vernier caliper (147 6” digital caliper, General Tools and Instruments), and the height was measured by a spherometer (JD15160, Japson). The yolk index was calculated by using the below-mentioned equation. Measuring the parameter was done throughout the storage time.

Yolk Index  =  Yolk height   Yolk diameter 
(4)
2.2.5.3. Yolk and albumen weight percentages

Yolk and albumen percentages (Hristakieva et al., 2017) were calculated to identify the deterioration of eggs with the storage time. Initially, the weight of the whole egg was measured, and then the egg was cracked to separate the yolk by using an egg yolk separator. The weights of yolk and albumen were measured separately, and individual percentages were calculated.

Yolk weight percentage =   Weight of yolk   Weight of whole egg  × 100 %
(5)
Albumen weight percentage  =  Weight of albumen   Weight of whole egg  × 100 %
(6)
2.2.5.4. pH of the albumen and the yolk

The pH of the yolk and albumen were measured according to Pushpakumara et al. (2022) with some modifications. The yolk was separated from the albumen. Samples of yolk and albumen were prepared by adding 18 mL of distilled water to two grams of yolk and two grams of albumen separately. The samples were homogenized, and pH was measured by using a pH meter (PL-700PV, EZDO, Taipei City, Taiwan).

2.2.6. Shell thickness

The shell thickness of the cracked eggs was measured according to Sun et al. (2012). Egg shells were rinsed, and membranes were removed. The thickness of the eggshell was measured by using an outside micrometer screw gauge (103-137, Mitutoyo, Kanagawa, Japan). Shell thickness was measured on Days 1, 14, 28, and 42.

2.2.7. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis

Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) analysis was conducted according to Pushpakumara et al. (2022). The samples were prepared by freeze-drying egg albumin. A sample of 25 mg was used for the analysis by using an FT-IR machine (Alpha, Bruker, Germany). Results were obtained over the range of 500 cm−1 to 4,000 cm−1. Characterization of egg albumen and confirmation of distinct structures were done by curve fitting. The test was conducted on day 01 and 49.

2.2.8. Gemological microscopy

The structure of hard-boiled eggs was observed according to the method described by Eregama et al. (2024). Eggs were boiled at 90°C for 15 min, peeled, and sliced so that the specimen was compatible with a microscopic view. The structure of egg albumen was examined under the power of ×80 by using gemological microscope (KSW8000, Kruss, Hamburg, Germany). The microscopic inspection test was done on Days 1, 28, and 60 of storage time.

2.3. Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with MINITAB17.0 statistical software (Minitab Ltd., Coventry, UK). Three replicates were carried out for each experiment. One-way ANOVA was used to examine the impact of storage time on quality parameters at a 95% confidence interval.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Test for Salmonella

The negative pressure created due to temperature drop at the laying enhances bacterial penetration. In addition, the cuticle takes a short time to mature soon after the egg is laid, which may create a possibility for Salmonella to penetrate through the pores, contaminate, and multiply within the egg content. Besides, temperatures ranging from 20°C to 37°C are optimum growth temperatures for Salmonella enterica serovars (Chousalkar et al., 2021; Miyamoto et al., 1998). Therefore, storage of contaminated eggs due to horizontal or vertical transmission can cause the multiplication of Salmonella during the experiment (25°C±2). Hence, samples of eggs were tested for Salmonella with the motive of assessing quality and avoiding any unintentional breakout or multiplication during the storage and handling. All the tested samples were negative for the Salmonella test. Therefore, eggs were safely stored at room temperature (25°C±2) for the experiment with storage time. The experiment was conducted with predetermined time intervals of up to 49 days. According to the USDA (2024c), code dating can be used on cartons to add expiration dates, and the period cannot be more than 30 days from the day eggs were packed into the carton.

3.2. Shape index

According to the egg grading manual by the USDA (2024a), shell shape is considered an external quality factor. A normal egg has an oval shape with a large end and tapering to form a smaller end. When grading the eggs, to be AA quality, there should be a normal oval shape and free from thin spots. In this experiment, the eggs were found to be of oval shape with an average shape index of 78.99±1.84. The shells were free from thin spots, ridges, and rough areas that can affect egg shape. Eggs were categorized into three based on shape index by Duman et al. (2016) as sharp (<72), normal (72-76), and round (>76) eggs. Accordingly, eggs in the experiment can be classified as round eggs. The shell index was measured at the initial stage to ensure that the eggs for the experiment were not misshaped.

3.3. Estimation of shelf life according to the quality parameters
3.3.1. Grading of eggs and Haugh unit (HU)

The Haugh Unit (HU) is considered a measurement of the freshness of eggs that is influenced by environmental factors (temperature, time, and humidity of storage). A higher HU value indicates better albumin quality. However, thick albumin thins over storage time and converts to thin albumen, causing changes in pH and losing gel structure. This process affects the HU measurement (Kumari et al., 2022). The HU measurements, along with the visual parameters and air cell depth measurements described in Table 1, were used to grade eggs. In the current experiment, a significant decrease in HU (p<0.05) was identified (Fig. 2) with the storage time from Day 1 to 49 (98.77±2.67 to 39.44±4.95, respectively). According to the results, the ‘AA’ quality of eggs gradually loses its’ quality to ‘A’ on the third week (HU with 71.75±1.09, 66.93±2.83 on Days 21 and 28, respectively) and is observed to continue an ‘A’ grade on the fourth week. Further deterioration was examined, resulting in ‘B’ grade eggs with HU of 55.26±2.76 on Day 35. According to a study by Caner and Yuceer (2015), the HU of uncoated eggs was reduced to 58.93±0.96 on the fifth week of storage at 24°C.

kjfp-31-6-947-g2
Fig. 2. Variation of Haugh unit at room temperature (25°C±2) during the storage period from day 01 to 49. Values with different letters (a-f) on the bars differ significantly (p<0.05).
Download Original Figure

The USDA (2024b) states that ‘B’ grade eggs are often used for breaking stock and baking and must be concerned about defects in them during applications. Additionally, some sources state that consuming eggs whose HU is 70 is not recommended because of the loss of nutritional quality of eggs and the potential for microbial contamination (Martinez et al., 2021). Based on these findings, a conclusion can be drawn that shell eggs can be stored at room temperature to get ‘A’ grade eggs until 28 days of storage, which are suitable for direct consumption.

3.3.2. Egg weight loss (%)

Egg weight is a quality parameter that decreases with increasing storage period due to the changes that occur, such as drying, shrinking of the cuticle, and increasing shell pore size, causing an exchange of carbon dioxide for oxygen and evaporation of moisture (Kumari et al., 2020). The initial average weight of the eggs was calculated and found to be 52.2 g. According to the weight class of US consumer grades for shell eggs, eggs used in the experiment can be categorized as medium size eggs (USDA, 2024a). A gradual increase in percentage weight loss was identified with the storage. In a previous study, where the storage of uncoated eggs at 24°C has shown similar results to the current study (Caner and Yuceer, 2015). The fifth-week reading for uncoated eggs stored at 24°C was recorded as 6.71%±0.73, while in the current study, 6.44%±0.87 on the 35th day. The grade was identified as ‘B,’ and the weight loss percentage was on Day 35 significantly different (p<0.05) from Days 21 and 28 (3.89%±0.45 and 5.04%±0.65, respectively), where the egg grade was A. Therefore, considering visual parameters, HU, and weight loss percentages (Table 2), the best storage period to get quality eggs at room temperature (25°C±2) can be decided as 28 days.

Table 2. Summary of the egg grade, air cell depth, Haugh unit, and weight loss percentages of the egg stored at 25±2°C with the storage
Day Haugh unit Air cell depth (mm) Egg grade Weight loss percentage (%)
1 98.77±2.671)A2) 0.10±0.01 AA -
3 103.22±4.90A 1.02±0.09 AA 0.46±0.06F
7 93.62±93.62A,B 1.19±0.12 AA 0.90±0.13E,F
10 89.52±0.75B 1.37±0.11 AA 1.28±0.18E,F
14 75.77± 2.57C 2.48±0.19 AA 1.91±0.27E
21 71.75±1.09C 4.47±0.03 A 3.89±0.45D
28 66.93±2.83C,D 4.89±0.16 A 5.04±0.65D
35 55.26 ±2.76D,E 6.71±0.15 B 6.44±0.88C
42 46.027±1.39E,F 6.69±0.13 B 7.93±1.08B
49 39.44±4.95F 6.99±0.12 B 9.49±1.32A

Values are mean±SD (n=3).

A-FMeans in the same column with different capital letters differ significantly (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table
3.3.3. Yolk and albumen quality parameters

Yolk color, yolk index, pH, and percentages of albumen and yolk were considered during assessing the quality of the egg during the storage period (Table 3). During storage, carbonic acid in eggs breaks down into carbon dioxide and water. Carbon dioxide is expelled from egg pores, causing an increase in the pH of the egg white and losing the gel structure. Higher temperature causes higher loss of carbon dioxide and higher deterioration of the egg quality (Kumari et al., 2020). The albumen pH of a freshly laid egg lies between 7.6 and 9.7 (Quan et al., 2021). A previous study on eggs from Bovan White hens (50-week-old) showed that there is a significant increase in the pH of albumen on Day 10 of storage (9.11) compared to Day 1 (8.70) at 29°C (Samli et al., 2005). Similar results were observed in the current experiment, where the pH of albumen on Day 1, 8.06±0.20, was significantly increased to 9.14±0.12 on Day 7 (p<0.05). Thereafter, a significant difference in albumen pH was not identified until the end of the experiment on Day 49. Albumen pH was increased to 9.30±0.17 on Day 28, and no significant difference was identified when the quality of eggs changed from ‘AA’ grade eggs on Day 14 (9.20±0.09) to ‘A’ grade eggs on Day 28. In conclusion, other than visual parameters, HU value, and weight loss percentages, the deviation of albumen pH also suggests that eggs can be stored for 28 days at room temperature (25°C±2).

Table 3. Deviation of yolk index, yolk and albumen percentages, and pH with the storage (at 25°C±2)
Day Yolk index Yolk weight percentage (%) Albumen weight
percentage (%)
Yolk pH Albumen pH
1 0.52±0.061)A2) 25.42±1.76C,D 61.32±1.24A 7.97±0.10A 8.06±0.20B
3 0.44 ±0.04A,B 24.32±0.87D 60.90±2.48A 6.83±0.13B 8.09±0.16B
7 0.38 ±0.03B,C,D 24.49±0.41D 62.68±1.15A 6.35±0.06E 9.14±0.12A
10 0.40±0.03B,C 24.49±0.22D 61.88±1.45A 6.54±0.06B,C,D,E 9.19±0.20A
14 0.34±0.02C,D 25.78±0.31B,C,D 60.20±1.02A,B 6.53±0.08C,D,E 9.20±0.09A
21 0.33±0.05C,D 27.88±0.31B,C 58.21±1.17A,B 6.32±0.09E 8.86±0.05A
28 0.28±0.01D,E 24.99±0.19C,D 61.32±2.59A 6.46±0.07D,E 9.30±0.17A
35 0.23±0.03E,F 28.66±0.54A,B 57.70±2.5A,B 6.49±0.13B,C,D,E 9.26±0.03A
42 0.20±0.03E,F 25.03±1.44D 58.97±1.92A,B 6.73±0.16B,C,D 9.38±0.04A
49 0.16±0.02F 30.99±0.55A 55.08±0.84B 6.81±0.03B,C 9.30±0.06A

Values are mean±SD (n=3).

A-FMeans in the same column with different capital letters differ significantly (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table

In the present research, the yolk index has significantly reduced (p<0.05) from 0.52±0.06 (Day 1) to 0.16±0.02 (Day 49) at room temperature. A significant reduction of yolk index is there between ‘AA’ graded eggs on Day 1 and ‘B’ graded eggs on Day 35 (0.23±0.03, p<0.05). A yolk index is a parameter that gives an idea about the shape of the yolk, whether it is round and firm or flattened. Egg yolks become flattened with storage mainly due to the entry of water via the vitelline membrane due to the breakdown of carbonic acid, and this causes an increase in permeability. The condition leads to egg yolk mottling (Kumari et al., 2020). Hence, in the current study, the shape of the yolk on Day 35 is considerably flattened compared to Day 1. The entering of water into the yolk can also be the reason for a significant increase in yolk weight percentage (from 25.42%±1.76 on Day 1 to 30.99%±0.55 on Day 49) and a significant decrease in albumen weight percentage (from 61.32%±1.24 on day 01 to 55.08%±0.84 on Day 49) with the storage period (p<0.05).

The yolk color of the egg is another quality parameter that is frequently measured by the yolk fan (A004, 2005-HMB, DSM). In the current study, a considerable change in yolk color was not identified with storage. The yolk color of eggs remained the same unit (10 in yolk color fan) throughout the storage period. Some studies (Martinez et al., 2021) recorded that there was a significant decrease in yolk color at the end of Day 10 (eggs stored at 26.50°C±5.48), where measurements were taken from an electronic colorimeter. However, according to the current study, there is no significant effect on yolk color when egg quality changes from ‘AA’ (Day 14) to ‘A’ grade (Days 21 and 28) when measured through the yolk color fan. This also facilitates the conclusion that eggs can be stored for 28 days at room temperature (25°C±2), considering most of the quality parameters.

3.3.4. Shell thickness

According to previous studies by Grashorn et al. (2016), the magnitude of change of shell thickness was very small (in both 35-and 65-week-old categories of hens) with storage. In this experiment, shell thickness was measured with the storage since Stadelman and Cotterill (1995) describe that for eggs to have a better than 50% probability of surviving on typical market handling and to avoid cracking, the shell must be at least 0.33 mm thick. In the study, the eggshell thickness was significantly increased (p<0.05) on Day 28 (0.469±0.150 mm) compared to Day 1 (0.388±0.045 mm). Thus, shell thickness on Day 28 has a considerable probability of surviving on typical market handling.

3.3.5. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy

FTIR analysis was done to identify the deterioration of the egg composition with the storage period. The major difference identified between the eggs that are fresh and stored is in albumen pH and quality (Akter et al., 2014). Therefore, FTIR analysis was done for the egg albumen. Two main peaks (between 3,500-3,000 cm−1 and 2,000-1,500 cm−1) were obtained within the range of 400-4,000 cm−1 on both Day 1 (Fig. 3A) and Day 60 (Fig. 3B). A similar study by Eregama et al. (2024) helps to describe two peaks of the results. Accordingly, the peak at 3,282 cm−1 is due to the bond amide A of ovomucin (3,272.20 cm−1) and ovotransferrin (3,273.54 cm−1), peak at 1,636 cm−1 due to bond amide I (C=O stretch) of ovalbumin, lysozyme, ovomucoid, avidin, ovomucin, and ovotransferrin, while the peak at 1,543 cm−1 is due to amide II bond (N-H bend in the plane and C-N stretch) of lysozyme, avidin, ovomucin, and ovotransferrin. The deviation on the 60th day of storage on a peak between 3,500-3,000 cm−1 can be due to the reduction of disulfide bonds leading to the degradation of ovomucin or the disruption of the ovomucin-lysozyme complex, which has been identified as the possible reason for egg white thinning during extended storage (Guha et al., 2019).

kjfp-31-6-947-g3
Fig. 3. FTIR spectroscopy of eggs stored under 25°C±2 on day 01 (A) and on day 49 (B).
Download Original Figure
3.3.6 Gemological microscopy

Boiling eggs is a simple and frequently used cooking method. Observing the hard-boiled structure of eggs under a gemological microscope is done to identify any change in structural integrity with storage that can affect the consumers’ perception. However, a clearly visible change in the structure of hard-boiled eggs was identified on Day 60 (Fig. 4) but not on Day 28. Despite the occurrence of significantly low HU, yolk index, and significantly highest loss of egg weight during storage (p<0.05), there was no visually visible difference identified in eggs stored at room temperature that were hard-boiled. Since a clear difference in the hard-boiled structure was not identified on Day 49, the storage period of the egg for this experiment was increased to 60 days to get a clear reference to show that even the hard-boiled structure is affected by the storage time. Therefore, limiting shelf life to 28 days will help consumers get additional benefits in terms of perception other than the quality parameters discussed above.

kjfp-31-6-947-g4
Fig. 4. The structure of hardboiled eggs (90°C for 15 min) which were stored at room temperature (25°C±2) on the day of laying (day 01 (A), day 28 (B), and day 60 (C) under gemological microscope (KSW8000, Kruss).
Download Original Figure

Sources record that most eggs also must be sold by the 21st and utilized by the 28th day of laying in the Chinese market (Huang et al., 2012). This experiment further supports the idea of previous studies where the shelf life of table eggs must be 28 days from laying under room temperature (25°C±2).

4. Conclusions

Eggs are frequently stored at room temperature in retail markets in developing countries. Furthermore, deterioration of egg quality occurs with storage conditions, which include temperature and time. Hence, for consumers and producers to consume and manufacture safe and high-quality food, it is very crucial to have a thorough understanding of the variation of quality parameters of eggs at ambient temperature. Finding variation trends in quality parameters of shell eggs that were stored at room temperature within the shelf life of the shell eggs was the primary goal of the study. In the current experiment, the sole focus was on the quality parameters that can be easily measured within the laboratory context to get an idea about how grading and other measurements change with the storage time. Therefore, after 28 days, deterioration of eggs occurred to B grade, which is usually considered good for breaking and baking stock as per the USDA egg-grading manual. Thus, after considering whole variation trends and data from gemological microscopy, it was concluded that poultry eggs can be stored for 28 days at room temperature (25°C), where their quality will remain at an ‘A’ grade, making them suitable for direct consumption. However, consumers must handle eggs carefully during storage as well. The extended next stage of the research is to investigate more microbial deterioration of the table eggs stored at ambient temperature (25°C) with storage time.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Switz Lanka Pvt. Ltd for providing resources for this research study.

Notes

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Zaffar J, Abeyrathne EDNS. Data curation: Maggonage MHU, Sandakelum KMR. Formal analysis: Maggonage MHU, Sandakelum KMR. Methodology: Zaffar J, Abeyrathne EDNS. Validation: Abeyrathne EDNS. Investigation: Maggonage MHU, Sandakelum KMR. Writing - original draft: Maggonage MHU, Sandakelum KMR. Writing - review & editing: Abeyrathne EDNS.

Ethics approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

Funding

None.

ORCID

Maggonage Hasini Udeshika Maggonage (First author) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5417-0457

Kuruppu Mudiyanselage Rasika Sandakelum (First author) https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6849-7573

Jeevunjee Zaffar https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8971-386X

Edirisingha Dewage Nalaka Sandun Abeyrathne (Corresponding author) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6284-2145

References

1.

Akter Y, Kasim A, Omar H, Sazili AQ. Effect of storage time and temperature on the quality characteristics of chicken eggs. J Food Agric Environ. 12:87-92 2014;

2.

Belitz HD, Grosch W, Schieberle P. Eggs.In: Food Chemistry. In: Belitz HD, Grosch W, Schieberle P, editors.(Editors)Springer. Heidelberg: p p. 546-562 2009;

3.

Caner C, Yuceer M. Efficacy of various protein-based coating on enhancing the shelf life of fresh eggs during storage. Poult Sci. 94:1665-1677 2015;

4.

Chousalkar KK, Khan S, Mcwhorter AR. Microbial quality, safety and storage of eggs. Curr Opin Food Sci. 38:91-95 2021;

5.

Duman M, Sekeroglu A, Yıldırım A, Eleroglu H, Camcı O. Relation between egg shape index and egg quality characteristics. Europ Poult Sci. 80:1-9 2016;

6.

Eregama GSR, Aung SH, Pitawala HMJC, Ali M, Lee SY, Park JY, Abeyrathne EDNS, Nam KC. Evaluation of physicochemical changes in hard-boiled eggs stored at different temperatures. Food Sci Anim Resour. 44:74-86 2024;

7.

FAO. Chapter 3: Egg packaging, transport and storage. Available fromhttps://www.fao.org/4/y4628e/y4628e05.htm AccessedOct. 28, 2024

8.

Grashorn M, Juergens A, Bessei W. Effects of storage conditions on egg quality. Lohmann Inf. 50:22-27 2016;

9.

Guha S, Majumder K, Mine Y. Egg proteins.In: Encyclopedia of Food Chemistry. Elsevier. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2019

10.

Hristakieva P, Oblakova M, Mincheva N, Lalev M, Kaliasheva K. Phenotypic correlations between the egg weight, shape of egg, shell thickness, weight loss and hatchling weight of turkeys. Slovak J Anim Sci. 50:90-94 2017;

11.

Huang Q, Qiu N, Ma MH, Jin YG, Yang H, Geng F, Sun SH. Estimation of egg freshness using s-ovalbumin as an indicator. Poult Sci. 91:739-743 2012;

12.

Hunton P. Research on eggshell structure and quality: An historical overview. Braz J Poult Sci. 7:67-71 2005;

13.

Jones D, Musgrove M. Effects of extended storage on egg quality factors. Poult Sci. 84:1774-1777 2005;

14.

Koppel K, Suwonsichon S, Chitra U, Lee J, Chambers IV E. Eggs and poultry purchase, storage, and preparation practices of consumers in selected Asian countries. Foods. 3:110-127 2014;

15.

Kumari A, Tripathi UK, Maurya V, Kumar M. Internal quality changes in eggs during storage. Int J Sci Environ Technol. 9:615-624 2020;

16.

Li J, Zhu S, Jiang S, Wang J. Prediction of egg storage time and yolk index based on electronic nose combined with chemometric methods. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 82:369-376 2017;

17.

Martinez Y, Soliz ND, Bejarano MA, Paz P, Valdivie M. Effect of storage duration and temperature on daily changes in external and internal egg quality of eggs from Dekalb white® laying hens. Europ Poult Sci. 85:1-14 2021;

18.

Miyamoto T, Horie T, Baba E, Sasai K, Fukata T, Arakawa A. Salmonella penetration through eggshell associated with freshness of laid eggs and refrigeration. J Food Prot. 61:350-353 1998;

19.

Omana DA, Liang Y, Kav NNV, Wu J. Proteomic analysis of egg white proteins during storage. Proteomics. 11:144-153 2011;

20.

Pushpakumara PU, Nawarathne SR, Pitawala HMJC, Abeyrathne EDNS. Internal quality attributes of chicken eggs coated with hik (lannea coromandelica) and mango (mangifera indica) wax stored at room temperature. Anim Ind Technol. 9:79-91 2022;

21.

Quan C, Xi Q, Shi X, Han R, Du Q, Forghani F, Xue C, Zhang J, Wang J. Development of predictive models for egg freshness and shelf-life under different storage temperatures. Food Qual Saf. 5:1-7 2021;

22.

Roberts D, Greenwood M. Practical Food Microbiology.3rd edJohn Wiley & Sons. Oxford: 2003

23.

Samli HE, Agma A, Senkoylu N. Effects of storage time and temperature on egg quality in old laying hens. J Appl Poult Res. 14:548-553 2005;

24.

Stadelman WJ, Cotterill OJ. Egg Science and Technology.4th edThe Haworth Press. NY: p. USA 1995;

25.

Sun CJ, Chen SR, Xu GY, Liu XM, Yang N. Global variation and uniformity of eggshell thickness for chicken eggs. Poult Sci. 91:2718-2721 2012;

26.

Sunder A, Wilkens M, Bohm V, Liebert F. Egg yolk colour in organic production as affected by feeding-consequences for farmers and consumers. Food Chem. 382:131854 2022;

27.

USDA. Egg-grading manual. Available fromhttps://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/EggGradingManual.pdf AccessedAug. 07, 2024a

28.

USDA. Shell egg grades. Available fromhttps://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards/egg/grade-shields AccessedSep. 05, 2024b

29.

USDA. Shell eggs from farm to table. Available fromhttps://www.fsis.usda.gov/food-safety/safe-food-handling-and-preparation/eggs/shell-eggs-farm-table AccessedOct. 28, 2024c

30.

Waimaleongora-Ek P, Garcia KM, No HK, Prinyawiwatkul W, Ingram DR. Selected quality and shelf life of eggs coated with mineral oil with different viscosities. J Food Sci. 74:S423-S429 2009;