Research Article

Optimization of the succinylation process of Anchomanes diffformis starch and the impact of starch modification on quality

Akeem Olayemi Raji*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4805-4943, Tawakalitu Eniola Arunahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2566-2380, Maimuna Sanihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-386x, Oludolapo Akinyemi Osunrinadehttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4534-3798
Author Information & Copyright
Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kwara State 23431, Nigeria
*Corresponding author Akeem Olayemi Raji, Tel: +234-808-449-9398, E-mail: akeem.raji@kwasu.edu.ng

Citation: Raji AO, Aruna TE, Sani M, Osunrinade OA. Optimization of the succinylation process of Anchomanes diffformis starch and the impact of starch modification on quality. Food Sci. Preserv., 31(5), 773-787 (2024)

Copyright © The Korean Society of Food Preservation. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Aug 22, 2024; Revised: Sep 15, 2024; Accepted: Oct 11, 2024

Published Online: Oct 31, 2024

Abstract

The recent increase in demand for starch in food industries necessitates research into new sources of starch. The optimization process of succilynated-Anchomanes difformis starch was carried out using the standard method. The purified Anchomanes difformis starch samples were succinylated using 0-12% succinic anhydride. The FTIR, functional properties, pasting properties, chemical composition, enzymatic activities and anti-nutritional properties of the samples were determined using standard methods. The gelatinization temperature, solubility index, bulk density, swelling power, oil absorption capacity and water absorption capacity ranged from 62.55-80.50°C, 1.08-2.22%, 0.54-0.73%, 2.07-4.12%; 113-176% and 206-259%, respectively. The pasting temperature, peak time, setback, final viscosity, breakdown, trough and peak viscosity varied from 74.25-84.05°C, 4.17-5.00 min, 460-970.5 RVU, 1,692.5-2,339 RVU, 900.5-1,937.5 RVU, 102.71-114.04 RVU, and 189.08-270.58 RVU, respectively. The moisture content, fat content, protein content, ash content, crude fiber, and carbohydrates ranged from 7.17-12.5%, 0.92-1.51%, 3.37-3.77%, 0.57-3.67%, 0.85-1.37% and 75.44-86.10%, respectively. The anti-nutritional contents were below the acceptable limit. The amylopectin and amylose ranged from 82.82-88.23% and 11.77-17.18%, respectively. The pancreatic lipase, α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities varied from -11.52-45.02, -16.68-72.12 and 49.22-72.87, respectively. Conclusively, succinylation at 11.19% would produce Anchomanes difformis starch succinate of optimum quality for food applications.

Keywords: Anchomanes difformis; chemical composition; chemical & functional properties; enzymatic activities; pasting properties

1. Introduction

Anchomanes difformis (forest anchomanes) belongs to the Araceae family and it regarded as a herbaceous plant. It is sometimes referred to as the forest ‘Anchomanes’ in English (Croat and Ortiz, 2020). However, it is known as “Abirisoko” or “igo” among the Yoruba-speaking tribes of southwestern Nigeria. It contains an appreciable starch content of 21%, which is comparable to other starch sources (Oyedele et al., 2020).

Starch is a natural biodegradable bio-polymer widely used in many industries (Afolayan et al., 2020). Its diverse industrial usage is a result of its availability at low cost, high calorific value and great functional properties (Diyana et al., 2021; Waterschoot et al., 2015). Starch is a semi-crystalline carbohydrate that can be found in grains, roots, rhizomes, leaves, seeds and tubers of most plants (Phukan and Nongkhlaw, 2022).

Native starches are commonly consumed as food, but unsuitable for many applications due to their poor ability to withstand processing conditions (Singh and Chudasama, 2020), hence, the need for modification. Modified starch is a native starch whose physical and chemical properties have been altered in order to improve its functional characteristics (Özden and Sönmez, 2019; Raji et al., 2020). Interestingly, starch modification is carried out to starch granules’ stability during processing and makes it suitable for various foods and industrial applications (Raji et al., 2020). The properties of starch that are altered during modification are retrogradation behavior, association behavior, viscosity, gelatinization properties, pasting properties, and shelf-life stability of final products (Raji et al., 2020). Modified starch can resist amylase digestion in the small intestine to some varying degrees, and it is broken down to short-chain fatty acids by the activities of microflora in the large intestine (Sorndech et al., 2018). The derivatives obtained from the modification of starch are useful in plastic, food, cosmetics, textiles, adhesives, pharmaceutical, and paper industries (Adewale et al., 2022).

On the other hand, succinylation is a chemical modification process of reacting starch with succinic anhydride (Raji et al., 2020). However, succinylated starch possesses high viscosity, low gelatinization temperature, high paste clarity, better paste stability, high thickening power and good film-forming properties (Chakraborty et al., 2022). Noteworthily, the addition of starch succinate to the diet reduces dietary energy density and depletes the digestion of foods, thereby making food products developed from stanch succinate desirable for people suffering from diabetes (Ahmad et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2020). Since systematic studies on the succinylation of Anchomanes difformis starch are scanty, this study is designed to examine the effects of succinic anhydride on Anchomanes difformis starch and to evaluate the effect of succinylation on the modified starches’ qualities.

2. Materials and methodology

2.1. Materials

Anchomanes difformis tubers were collected from Omu-aran, an Area of Kwara state, Nigeria. The samples were kept in an open space in the laboratory prior to starch extraction.

2.2. Methodology
2.2.1. Isolation of starch

The method of Emeje et al. (2012) with slight modifications was used for the starch isolation as described in Fig. 1. Anchomanes difformis tubers were peeled, washed with clean water and chopped into smaller sizes (1.0 cm thick). The slices were blended in a hammer mill for about 2-3 mins. The slurry obtained was sieved with a muslin cloth and further soaked in 1.5 L of 0.03 M NaOH solution for 1 h. The supernatant was decanted and the residue was neutralized with 0.5 M HCL solution to a pH of 6.0. The neutralized residue was washed three times with distilled water and centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 5 min. The wet starch obtained was thinly spread on trays and dried in a cabinet drier at 50°C for 12 h.

kjfp-31-5-773-g1
Fig. 1. Isolation of Anchomanes difformis starch.
Download Original Figure
2.2.2. Experimental design

A simple lattice design of the Design Expert version 6.0 was used to investigate the effects of two independent process variables namely, the percentage of succinic anhydride (A) and percentage of starch (B) on the responses (FTIR, functional properties and pasting properties of the samples). The variable ranges, as shown in Table 1, were selected based on the literature (Raji et al., 2020). However, succinylated starches were prepared using the method of Awokoya et al. (2011) with some modifications as described below:

Table 1. Simple lattice design for the mixing ratio of succinic anhydride and purified Anchomanes difformis starch
Component A succinic acid (%) Component B starch (%)
0.00 100.00
3.00 97.00
6.00 94.00
9.00 91.00
12.00 88.00
Download Excel Table

The purified Anchomanes difformis starch was succinylated at ambient temperature (30°C) using the method of Awokoya et al. (2011). Starch (100 g) was dispersed in 300 mL of distilled water and stirred magnetically for 1 h, after which it was adjusted to a pH 11.0 using 0.03 M NaOH solutions. The samples were succinylated using succinic anhydride at 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12% and the mixtures were stirred gently using a magnetic stirrer for 2 h. At the end of the reaction, the pH of each slurry was adjusted to pH 6.0 using 0.03 M NaOH solution, filtered, washed with distilled water six times and dried in a cabinet drier at 50°C for 12 h, milled and kept in an airtight jar to prevent re-absorption of moisture (Fig. 2).

kjfp-31-5-773-g2
Fig. 2. Succinylation of Anchomanes difformis starch.
Download Original Figure
2.3. Analyses
2.3.1. Functional properties determination

The swelling power, water absorption capacity, oil absorption capacity, bulk density, solubility index and gelation temperature of both purified and succilynated Anchomanes difformis starch samples were determined using Afolayan et al. (2020) methods.

2.3.2. Pasting properties determination

The pasting properties of the starch samples were determined using a Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA model RVA 3D+, Newport Scientific PTY Ltd, Warriewood, Australia) as described by Badejo et al. (2017).

2.3.3. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of starch

The IR spectra of the starch samples were run as KBr pellets on the FTIR system (Spectrum BX PerkinElmer, Pittsburgh, England) in the frequency range 350-40,000 c/m as described by Gbenga et al. (2014).

2.3.4. Chemical composition determination
2.3.4.1. Proximate composition

The moisture contents, fat contents, ash contents, crude fiber contents, protein contents and carbohydrate contents, and both the purified and succilynated starch samples were determined following AOAC (2005) methods.

2.3.4.2. Determination of anti-nutritional properties

The tannin contents, oxalate contents, phytate contents, and saponin contents of both the purified and succinylated starch samples were determined following AOAC (2005) methods.

2.3.4.3. Determination of amylose and amylopectin content

The total amylose content of both the purified and succinylated starch samples was determined iodimetrically following the standard procedure described by Morrison and Laignelet (1983), while the percentage of amylopectin was determined by subtracting the percentage of amylose content from the amount of carbohydrate in the sample.

2.3.5. Determination of enzyme activity in the modified starch
2.3.5.1. α-Amylase

The procedure described by Kwon et al. (2008) was adopted for the determination of α-amylase inhibition assay with slight modification.

2.3.5.2. α-Glucosidase

Kwon et al. (2008) method with slight modification was used for the determination of α-glucosidase inhibition assay with slight modification.

2.3.5.3. Pancreatic lipase

The pancreatic lipase inhibitory activity of samples was determined according to the protocol reported by Eom et al. (2013), in which Anchomanes difformis starch was used as a reference inhibitor of pancreatic lipase.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Effects of succinylation levels on the functional properties of modified Anchomanes difformis starch

The gelatinization temperature, solubility index, bulk density, swelling power, oil absorption capacity and water absorption capacity ranged from 62.55-80.50°C, 1.08-2.22%, 0.54-0.73%, 2.07-4.12%; 113-176% and 206-259%, respectively (Table 2). The water absorption capacity (WAC) can be expressed as the ability of a sample to absorb water and it is an important property of starch that determines its hydration potential in hot water or during gelatinization (Awoyale et al., 2020). The highest WAC (259%) observed in the succinylated starch showed that it might absorb more water during its utilization than native starch which had the lowest WAC (206%). Succinylation of Anchomanes difformis starch in this study resulted in an increase in WAC of its starch, and this might be due to a reduction in starch crystallinity as a result of succinylation, which allowed water to migrate into the starch granules (Raji et al., 2020). Similar findings were reported by (Arueya and Oyewale, 2015) who observed an increase in WAC of succinylated acha starch samples (155-205%). The observed higher oil absorption capacities in the Anchomanes difformis starch succinates implied that they might have better emulsion stability than the native starch. However, the oil absorption capacity of starch can be improved by chemical modification and this improvement is due to the incorporation of functional groups in the starch molecules, thereby giving it a higher binding capacity than the native starch (Olu-Owolabi et al., 2014; Raji et al., 2020).

Table 2. Functional properties of Anchomanes difformis starch
Level of sucinylation (%) Water absorption capacity (%) Oil absorption capacity (%) Swelling capacity (%) Bulk density (%) Solubility index (%) Gelatinization temperature (°C)
0.0 206.70±1.001)d 113.60±0.00e 2.07±0.00e 0.73±0.00a 2.22±0.00a 80.50±0.00a
3.0 221.50±1.00c 126.47±1.00d 3.44±0.02c 0.54±0.00d 1.18±0.00c 74.18±0.00b
6.0 257..10±2.00b 176.56±1.00a 4.04±0.01b 0.62±0.01b 1.08±0.01e 70.25±0.00b
9.0 259.45±0.00a 166.84±0.00b 3.13±0.00d 0.61±0.00b 1.15±0.00d 62.55±0.00c
12.0 258.67±1.00ab 154.54±0.00c 4.12±0.01a 0.59±0.01c 2.02±0.01b 66.57±0.00c

1) Mean±SD (n=3) and different superscript letters (a-d) with the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table

A slight increase in the swelling capacities of the samples was observed. The native starch possessed the lowest swelling capacity, while the sample that was succinylated with 12% succinic anhydride had the highest swelling capacity. The increment in the swelling capacity of the modified sample might be a result of the formation of the succinyl group which reduced the intermolecular hydrogen bonds and also strengthened the long chains of amylopectin with the simultaneous decline in amylose content (Ikegwu et al., 2009; Raji et al., 2020). However, higher swelling capacities of the starch succinates depict that they may reconstitute better in water compared to the native starch.

The bulk density (BD) is an indicator of food product porosity and it determines both the choice of packaging materials and packaging design (Majhi et al., 2019). It was observed that succinylation significantly influenced the bulk densities of the starch succinate samples. Lower bulk density values were recorded in the succinylated samples when compared with the purified starch that was not succinylated. However, lower bulk densities are advantageous and economical, as it will reduce the cost of distribution during marketing (Falade and Oyeyinka, 2015). Interestingly, a diet possessing lower bulk density is needed by infants for easy swallowing without experiencing choking or suffocation (Raji et al., 2022). This shows that both infants and adults can consume the starch succinate. Therefore, the findings from this research will provide adequate information on how best to package Anchomanes difformis starch succinate.

It was revealed that the solubility index of the starch samples decreased up till 6% succinylation level and increased moderately thereafter. Interestingly, less water solubility values were exhibited by starch succinates than the native starch. However, the behavior might be a result of starch structure reorganization, which contributed to the weakness of the granules of starch during succinylation. A similar finding was reported by Arueya and Oyewale (2015) who researched the effect of succinylation degree on acha starch. It was observed that as the succinylation levels increased, the gelatinization temperatures decreased. The gelatinization temperatures (62.55-66.57°C) reported for 9% and 12% levels of succinylation fell within the ranges Segura-Campos et al. (2008) reported for octenylsuccinic starch from Phaseolus lunatus and Raji et al. (2020) established for starch succinates from Dioscoria villosa. The lower gelatinization temperature is advantageous, as such a sample can be used in food processing operations where a lower temperature is needed for thickener to gel. Also, energy might be conserved in this type of process.

3.2. Effects of succinylation levels on the FTIR of Anchomanes difformis starch

The detection of the functional group of active components can be achieved via the FT-IR spectrum (Raji et al., 2020). Anchomanes difformis modified starch samples exhibited typical Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectra absorption bands of starch backbones. A similar spectrum was also observed in the native starch FT-IR spectrum. However, characteristics bonds occurring at 3,383.03 cm−1, 3,382.47 cm−1, 3,382.59 cm−1, 3,383.56 cm−1 and 3,382.77 cm−1, which corresponded to the O-H stretching vibration were obtained at succinylation levels of 0%, 3%, 6%, 9%, and 12% respectively. The band ranges in Anchomanes difformis starch samples were slightly lower than the absorption range for O-H vibration which was 3,500-3,700 cm−1. A shift in the O-H stretching peaks to a lower wavelength was noticed and this might be a result of intermolecular hydrogen bonds in the glycosidic ring that weakened the O-H bond. In addition, the presence of carbohydrates in the samples was confirmed through the O-H stretching. Similar results were reported by Arueya and Oyewale et al. (2015) who evaluated the FT-IR spectrum characteristics of succinylated acha starch and Raji et al. (2020) who researched the FT-IR spectrum characteristics of succinylated wild yam starch.

3.3. Effects of succinylation levels on the pasting properties of Anchomanes difformis starch

The peak viscosity, which is the maximum viscosity developed during or soon after the heating portion (Sanni et al., 2001), ranged from 189.08 to 270.58 RVU (Table 3). The succinylation level had a significant effect on the pasting properties of the samples (p≤0.05). The peak viscosity values variation might have a direct link with the starch samples amylose contents. High starch content is an indication of high peak viscosity and high water binding capacity of starch (Oyeyinka et al., 2019; Raji et al., 2020). Native starch displayed a lower peak viscosity when compared with the starch succinates. The values reported for the modified starch samples were within the range of values (195.17-399.58 RVU) established by Ezeocha and Okafor (2016) for D. dumetorum. The moderately high peak viscosities of the succinylated starch samples showed that the succinylated granules might likely become more rigid or less elastic and be able to withstand the shearing influence during food processing.

Table 3. Pasting properties of Anchomanes difformis starch
Level of sucinylation (%) Peak viscosity (RVU) Trough (RVU) Breakdown (RVU) Final viscosity (RVU) Setback (RVU) Peak time (mins) Pasting temperature (°C)
0.0 189.08±0.941)d 114.04±1.24a 75.04±0.30d 194.92±2.28a 80.88±1.11a 5.00±0.00a 84.05±0.21a
3.0 267.25±0.71ab 105.79±0.64c 161.45±0.01a 152.29±1.24c 46.50±0.19c 4.20±0.00b 74.28±0.04b
6.0 270.58±4.18a 111.58±0.33b 159.04±0.88b 158.62±0.53b 47.04±0.28c 4.23±0.04b 74.25±0.07b
9.0 241.33±1.36c 102.71±0.26d 138.67±1.65c 141.04±0.53d 38.33±0.27d 4.17±0.05b 74.65±0.49b
12.0 263.54±2.65b 106.83±0.47c 156.70±2.18b 154.92±2.00bc 48.08±0.15b 4.40±0.28b 74.40±0.14b

1) Mean±SD (n=3) and different superscript letters (a-d) with the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table

The trough viscosity of the native and succinylated starches varied from 102.71-114.04 RVU (Table 3). The sample that was succinylated at 3% had the lowest value, while the native starch sample had the highest value. The level of succinylation significantly influenced the trough viscosity of the starch samples. However, the values obtained fell below the range of values (133.45-206.60 RVU) established by Arueya and Oyewale (2015) for acha starch succinates. Their paste might possess a slightly lesser ability to withstand breakdown during cooling due to their moderate trough viscosity values (Raji et al., 2020). Worthily, the low trough viscosity recorded in some starch samples implied that the starch samples might be applicable to food systems where moderate paste stability during cooling is required (Adegunwa et al., 2015).

The breakdown viscosity ranged from 75.04-161.45 RVU. The highest value was observed in the sample that was succinylated at 3%, while the lowest breakdown viscosity was recorded in the native starch (Table 3). The level of succinylation significantly influenced the breakdown viscosity. Adebowale et al. (2005) reported that the lower the sample`s ability to withstand shear stress and heating during cooking, the higher the breakdown viscosity. Hence, it is indicative that the native starch might possess the ability to withstand heating and shear stress than the starch succinates due to their low breakdown viscosity values.

The final viscosity values varied from 141.04-194.92 RVU, with the sample that was succinylated at 9% having the lowest value, while the highest value was recorded in the native starch sample. The final viscosity is an indicative parameter that is used to determine starch paste stability (Raji et al., 2022). Amoo et al.(2014) reported that starch with high final viscosity would possess high pasting quality. High final viscosities reported for the succinylated starch samples affirmed that they might have appreciable pasting quality. However, the influence of cooling kinetics on the viscosity and the re-association of molecules of starch in the sample might be responsible for the variation in the final viscosity (Raji et al., 2020).

The setback viscosity values varied from 38.33-80.88 RVU. The sample that was succinylated at 9% had the lowest value, while the native starch sample had the highest value. Setback viscosity determines the re-association of starch molecules, and it measures paste cohesiveness (Ezeocha and Okafor, 2016). However, the low setback viscosities in the succinylated samples showed that they might have a low tendency to retrograde. This also shows that succinylated starch might be useful in food processing and allied industries where low retrograding ability is required, such as bread and other confectionaries (Sanful and Engmann, 2016). High setback value is also associated with syneresis (Adebowale et al., 2005). The high setback viscosity of the native starch sample makes it suitable for the production of gluten-free confectioneries where a high level of retrogradation or staling is required (Ezeocha and Okafor, 2016; Sanful and Engmann, 2016). Clearly, the setback viscosity of the starch samples was reduced by succinylation, thus supporting the claim of Arueya and Oyewale (2015) whose study reported a decrease in setback values of succinylated starch from acha.

The peak time value ranged from 4.17-5.00 minutes and the pasting temperature values ranged from 74.25-84.05°C (Table 3). The lowest peak time was recorded in the sample that was succinylated at 9%, while the native starch possessed the highest peak time. The peak time is a pointer to cooking convenience; however, the shorter the peak time is a reflection of the greater ease of cooking (Adegunwa et al., 2015). Interestingly, it could be inferred that the native starch might experience longer cooking time than the succinylated starch samples. The succinylated starch samples low peak time values implied that they might be good for the production of foods beacuse their processing times are shorter (Raji et al., 2020).

Pasting temperature determines the minimum temperature that is needed to cook any food sample (Olumurewa et al., 2019). It was observed that the native starch had the highest pasting temperature, while the lowest pasting temperature was recorded in the starch sample succinylated at 6%. It is clear from the results that succinylation shortened the pasting temperature of the starch samples, suggesting that starch succinates might cook faster with less energy than the native starch, thereby saving cost and time. However, the lowest pasting temperature at 6% succinylation level suggested that the starch succinate might form paste more easily than other products, and be applicable to food and non-food industrial processes due to conservation of energy and reduced cost (Awoyale et al., 2016).

3.4. Effects of succinylation levels on the proximate composition of Anchomanes difformis starch

The results for the proximate composition of the native and modified Anchomanes difformis starches are presented in Table 4. The moisture contents of the modified starch ranged from 7.17 to 12.5% with the native starch having the highest moisture (12.5%), while the least value (7.17%) was observed in the sample that was succinylated at 9%. The moisture contents values were in agreement with the values (7.22-11.22%) reported by Raji et al. (2020) for succinylated wild yam starch samples and (Adewumi et al., 2019) for Anchomanes difformis starch (8.10-10.40%). In addition, the moisture content of both native and succinylated Anchomanes difformis starch samples in this study are in line with the range (10-20%) recommended by Lawal and Adebowale (2005) for commercial starch. Therefore, the starch samples obtained in this study might have long shelf stability due to lower moisture contents which might limit microbial proliferation (Raji et al., 2022).

Table 4. Proximate composition of native and modified Anchomanes difformis starch
Sample (%) Moisture (%) Protein (%) Fat (%) Ash (%) Crude fibre (%) Carbohydrate (%)
0.0 12.5±0.501)a 5.52±0.04a 1.51±0.01a 3.67±0.29a 1.37±0.01a 75.44±0.72c
3.0 8.0±0.50b 3.75±0.07b 1.03±0.02b 0.67±0.29bc 0.93±0.02bc 85.62±0.02a
6.0 11.17±1.26a 3.68±0.04b 1.01±0.01b 1.03±0.04b 0.91±0.01c 82.20±1.33b
9.0 7.17±0.29b 3.77±0.04b 1.03±0.01b 1.00±0.10b 0.94±0.01b 86.10±0.38a
12.0 8.5±1.00b 3.37±0.04c 0.92±0.01c 0.57±0.12c 0.85±0.01d 85.80±0.98a

1) Mean±SD (n=3) and different superscript letters (a-d) with the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table

The fat contents of the native and modified Anchomanes difformis starches ranged from 0.92 to 1.51%, with the native starch having the highest value (1.51%), In comparison, the least fat content (0.92%) was obtained in sample succinylated at 12%. Succinylation of the Anchomanes difformis starch reduced the fat contents of the modified starches. Similar finding was reported by Raji et al. (2020), who observed a decrease in fat contents of succinylated wild yam starch samples (0.18-0.45%). Contrarily, the fat contents (1.01-7.38%) of Anchomanes difformis rhizome starch reported by Abe and Lajide (2014) were slightly higher than those reported for starch samples in this investigation.

The protein contents of the native and modified Anchomanes difformis starches ranged from 3.37 to 3.77%. The native starch sample had the highest protein content (3.77%) while the lowest value (3.37%) was observed in the starch sample whose succinylation was carried out at 12%. Anchomanes difformis starch succinylation decreased the protein contents of the modified starch samples. The non-starch components (fat, protein, and ash contents) of native starch are reduced by succinylation and this makes it greatly useful in some industrial applications (Raji et al., 2020). The native and modified starch samples obtained in this study are less-proteinous with values that are less than 5%. This is in agreement with the findings of Abe and Lajide (2014) who reported protein contents ranging from 1.33-5.33% for hot water treated and untreated Anchomanes difformis starch and also in line with the values (2.30-6.11%) reported by Raji et al. (2020) for modified wild yam starch.

Ash content is expressed as the residue that remains after destroying combustible organic matter (Edima-Nyah et al., 2019). The ash contents of the starch samples varied from 0.57 to 3.67 % with the native Anchomanes difformis starch having the highest value (3.67%), while the least value (0.57%) was observed in the sample that was succinylated at 12%. There was a reduction in the ash contents of the modified starch samples as the level of succinylation increased. The highest ash content in native starch is indicative that it might possess more mineral content than the succinylated starch samples since ash is an index of the mineral content of a food material (Ijeh et al., 2010). The reduction in ash content of the starch succinates might be a result of leaching during succinylation. The ash contents of the starch samples reported in this study are in line with the range of values (1.02-7.38%) reported in the findings of Abe and Lajide (2014) who researched starch from hot water-treated and untreated anchomanes difformis rhizome, but higher than those reported for Icacinatrichantha (0.80%) and (0.30%) Anchomanes difformis starch by Adewumi et al. (2019).

Fibre helps to prevent the re-absorption of bile acids, lowers cholesterol, and prevents the formation of plaques whose components are cholesterol, some fats, and protein (Islam et al., 2021). The crude fiber contents of the native and modified Anchomanes difformis starches ranged from 0.85 to 1.37% with the native starch sample significantly (p<0.05) having the highest value (1.37%). In comparison, the least value (0.91%) was noted in modified starch succinated with 12% succinic anhydride. Succinylation of the Anchomanes difformis starch reduced the crude fiber contents of all the modified starch samples. The crude fiber contents (0.09-0.23%) of wild yam starch reported by Raji et al. (2020) were lower than the values obtained for native and modified starches in this study. The reduction in the crude fiber contents of succinylated starch samples is in agreement with the previous reports (Lawal and Adebowale, 2005).

The carbohydrate contents of the native and modified Anchomanes difformis starches ranged from 75.44 to 86.10%, with modified starch from the sample that was succinylated at 12% having the highest carbohydrate (86.10%). In comparison, the least value (75.44%) from the native starch differed significantly (p≤0.05) from other starch samples. High carbohydrates (>80%) noted in the modified starches showed that succinylation increased the carbohydrate contents of the native starch. The carbohydrate contents of the starches in this study are in agreement with the values (85.53-86.28%) reported for modified wild yam starch in the work of Raji et al. (2020) and values (70.09-88.87%) reported for Anchomanes difformis starch by Abe and Lajide (2014). High carbohydrate contents of the starches in this investigation are advantageous as they may help to provide the energy needed to do work (Ijeh et al., 2010).

3.5. Effects of succinylation levels on the anti-nutritional factors of Anchomanes difformis starch

Table 5 presents the results for the anti-nutritional factors of native and modified Anchomanes difformis starch samples. Anti-nutrients or anti-nutritional factors can be expressed as those substances that occur naturally in feedstuffs that prevent normal metabolism and absorption of nutrients (Soetan and Oyewole, 2009).

Table 5. Antinutritional factors composition of native and modified Anchomanes difformis starch
Sample (%) Saponin (mg/100 g) Oxalate (mg/100 g) Tannin (mg/100 g) Phytate (mg/100 g)
0.0 0.86±0.011)b 0.26±0.00a 0.03±0.00c 0.07±0.00d
3.0 0.83±0.04b 0.25±0.01a 0.32±0.02a 0.12±0.00c
6.0 0.82±0.02b 0.25±0.01a 0.25±0.03b 0.54±0.02b
9.0 1.00±0.02a 0.31±0.07a 0.25±0.02b 0.59±0.02a
12.0 0.83±0.07b 0.25±0.02a 0.27±0.01b 0.10±0.00c

1) Mean±SD (n=3) and different superscript letters (a-d) with the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table

The saponin contents of the native and modified starches ranged from 0.82 to 1.00 mg/100 g. Modified starch from 9% succinylation significantly (p≤0.05) had the highest saponin (1.00 mg/100 g). In comparison, the least value (0.83 mg/100 g) was observed in samples that were succinylated at 3% and 12% and this showed that succinylation at 3 and 12% had no significant change on the saponin content of Anchomanes difformis starch. Succinylation of the native starch reduced the saponin contents of the modified starch but slightly increased the saponin level at 9% succinylation. The saponin contents (5.36-11.76 mg/100 g) of native and modified Anchomanes difformis starches reported by Abe and Lajide (2014) and the values (13.11-20.1 mg/100 g) observed by Senanayake et al. (2013) who worked on four cultivars of yam and cocoyam were higher than those obtained for starch samples in this investigation. The low saponin contents of the starches in this study indicate that they might be less capable of red blood cell damage, enzyme inhibition, and thyroid function intervention (Elekofehinti et al., 2021).

The oxalate contents of the starches ranged between 0.25-0.31 mg/100 g with the modified starch from 9% succinylation significantly (p≤0.05) having the highest oxalate content (0.31 mg/100 g). In comparison, the same least value (0.25 mg/100 g) was noted in samples that were succinylated at 3%, 6%, and 12%. Succinylation of the native starch reduced the oxalate contents of the modified starch samples, but slightly increased the oxalate level at 9% succinylation. Our report corroborates the findings of Raji et al. (2020) who reported a reduction in oxalate contents of succinylated wild yam starch (0.21- 0.31 mg/100 g). The low oxalate contents of the starches in this study infer that they may be incapable of preventing calcium absorption in the body (Kaushik and Cuervo, 2018).

The tannin contents of the native and modified Anchomanes difformis starches ranged from 0.03 to 0.32 mg/100 g. The highest tannin was significantly (p<0.05) noted in modified starch (0.32 mg/100 g) from 3% succinylation, while the least tannin (0.03 mg) was observed in the native starch sample. The tannin contents of the starches in this study conformed with those reported for wild yam starches (0.04-0.08) by Raji et al. (2020). On the flip side, Abe and Lajide (2014) reported (1.0-1.3 mg/100 g) for hot water treated and untreated Anchomanes difformis which were higher than the values obtained for starch samples in this study. Report had shown that tannins might have potential value as cytotoxic and/or antineoplastic agents and also improve the ferment-ability of meal nitrogen in the rumen (Macabeo et al., 2005)). When tannins are consumed excessively, enzymes responsible for protein absorption may be inactivated (Gupta et al., 2015); therefore, the starch samples produced in this study are safe for utilization in food products.

Phytate consumption may lead to lower mineral absorption (Gupta et al., 2015). They may also have a negative impact on the activity of digestive enzymes and act through chelation of mineral cofactors or interaction with protein (Reddy, 2001). The phytates contents of the native and modified starches varied from 0.07-0.59 mg/100 g. Succinylation of the native starch increased the phytate contents of the modified starch. The phytate contents of wild yam starch (0.08-0.13 mg/g) reported by Raji et al. (2020) and (0.08-0.40 mg/100 g) obtained for Anchomanes difformis by Abe and Lajide (2014) corroborate the findings of this study.

3.6. Effects of succinylation levels on the amylose and amylopectin contents of Anchomanes difformis starch

The results for the amylose and amylopectin contents of native and modified Anchomanes difformis starches are presented in Table 6. Amylose and amylopectin are polysaccharides contained in starches, with amylose occupying approximately 15-30% of starch, is a linear molecule with α-1,4 glucan linkage, while amylopectin, the major component of starch with 70-85% is a highly branched molecule with α-1,6 glucan linkage (Adejumo et al., 2013; Mayer et al., 2015). The amylose contents of the native and modified starches varied from 11.77-17.18% with the native starch having the highest level of amylose (17.18%). In comparison, the modified starch from 9% succinylation had the least amylose (11.77%). The result showed that succinylation reduced the amylose contents of the native starch. The amylose contents obtained for starches in this study are in agreement with the findings of Adewumi et al. (2019) who researched starches from Icacinatrichantha Oliv and Anchomanes difformis (11.2-15.0%) but lower than the values (49.89-59.70%) reported by Raji et al. (2020) for native and modified wild yam starches. The modified starches moderate amylose contents observed in this study are indicative that their swelling ability might be appreciable if used in food systems (Ikegwu et al., 2009).

Table 6. Amylose and amylopectin contents of native and modified Anchomanes difformis starch
Samples (%) Amylose (%) Amylopectin (%)
0.0 17.18±3.781)a 82.82±3.78b
3.0 16.88±1.82a 83.12±1.82b
6.0 12.82±1.04b 87.18±1.04a
9.0 11.77±1.13b 88.23±1.13a
12.0 14.62±1.13ab 85.38±1.13ab

1) Mean±D (n=3) and different superscript letters (a,b) with the same column indicate significant differences (p<0.05).

Download Excel Table

The amylopectin contents of the native and modified Anchomanes difformis ranged from 82.82 to 88.23% with modified starch from 9% succinylation having the highest value (88.23%). In comparison, the lowest value (82.82%) was observed in the native starch. Succinylation of the native starch increased the amylopectin contents of the modified starches. The amylopectin contents of native and modified wild yam starch (40.29-50.11%) reported by Raji et al. (2020) were lower than the values obtained for starch samples in this study. Contrarily, the amylopectin content (92.52%) of Dioscoreadregeana reported by (Afolayan et al., 2021) was slightly higher than those obtained for starch samples in this study. High amylopectin contents of the starch samples directly imply the high swelling power of the respective starch samples (Klunklin and Savage, 2018).

3.7. Effect of succinylation levels on enzymatic activities of native and succinylated Anchomanes difformis starch

The values obtained for α-amylase, α-glucosidase activities and pancreatic lipase of the starch samples ranged from 16.68-72.12, 49.22-72.87 and -11.52-45.02%, respectively. However, their mathematical expressions, as well as their plots against succinylation levels are revealed in Figs. 3-5 respectively. It was observed that there was an inverse relationship between the α-amylase activity and succinylation levels up to 3% succinylation level. Contrarily, the α-glucosidase activity exhibited a positive linear effect with the succinylation levels up to 3% succinylation level, but declined thereafter. Reasonably, the introduction of the succinyl groups disrupted the starch molecules, thereby limiting the enzymatic activities for starch structural degradation. This is highly desirable particularly for slow-digestible food products production, such as snacks for people suffering from diabetes. A similar finding was established by Marcazzan et al. (1999), who worked on lower α-amylase activity toward succinylated starch, amylase, and amylopectin.

kjfp-31-5-773-g3
Fig. 3. Enzymatic activities of succinylated Anchomanes difformis starch.
Download Original Figure
kjfp-31-5-773-g4
Fig. 4. Principal component biplot of the Anchomonas difformis starch quality determinants.
Download Original Figure
kjfp-31-5-773-g5
Fig. 5. Overlay plot of the response variables for the Anchomonas difformis starch succinate.
Download Original Figure
3.8. Correlation loading of Anchomanes difformis starch quality determinants

Table 7 reveals the correlation loading of the Anchomanes difformis starch quality determinants. The result implied that the principal component 1 (PC1) was correlated positively with bulk density, gelatinization temperature, and all proximate and pasting properties except carbohydrate, peak viscosity, and breakdown viscosity but negatively correlated with water absorption capacity, oil absorption capacity, swelling capacity, peak viscosity, breakdown viscosity, and tannin content. The PCA biplot, as shown in Fig. 4 allowed us to separate the samples based on the starch quality determinants. The result revealed a data variance of about 87.01%, with PC1 contributing 69.42% and PC2 contributing 17.59%. The Anchomanes difformis starch succinylated at 9% was in the same quadrant with the water absorption capacity, oil absorption capacity, amylopectin contents, saponin and oxalate. Similarly, the starch samples succinylated at 3, 9, and 12% were in the same quadrant with carbohydrate, swelling index, tannin, peak viscosity and breakdown viscosity. Interestingly, the native starch sample was in the quadrant with the fat, protein, ash, crude fibre, pasting time, bulk density and phytate. Therefore, the preference for the starch samples succinylated at 12% might be attributed to the high carbohydrate content, high swelling index, low tannin content, low peak viscosity, and low breakdown viscosity.

Table 7. Correlation loading of succinylated Anchomanes difformis starch quality determinants
Parameter F1 F2 F3 F4
Moisture 0.792 −0.103 0.587 −0.133
Fat 0.977 0.156 −0.086 −0.116
Protein 0.977 0.162 −0.087 −0.106
Ash 0.978 0.206 0.030 −0.026
Fibre 0.979 0.164 −0.094 −0.077
Carbohydrate −0.954 −0.053 −0.276 0.104
Water absorption −0.806 0.336 0.396 0.284
Oil absorption −0.736 0.396 0.549 0.020
Swelling capacity −0.837 −0.341 0.404 0.143
Bulk density 0.869 0.388 0.282 0.124
Solubilty 0.685 −0.168 −0.019 0.709
Gelatilization 0.847 −0.447 −0.020 −0.287
Peak −0.899 −0.377 0.189 −0.119
Trough 0.769 −0.230 0.587 −0.105
Breakdown −0.936 −0.323 0.103 −0.098
Final 0.970 −0.148 0.184 0.052
Setback 0.986 −0.119 0.065 0.094
Time 0.959 −0.023 0.040 0.278
Pasting 0.988 0.124 −0.049 0.074
Amylose 0.644 −0.669 −0.369 −0.017
Amlopectin −0.644 0.669 0.369 0.017
Saponin −0.159 0.895 −0.416 0.016
Oxalate −0.184 0.910 −0.371 −0.011
Tanin −0.944 −0.280 −0.127 −0.119
Phytate 0.541 0.737 0.285 −0.287
Download Excel Table
3.9. Predictive optimal mixing combination for Anchomos difformis starch succinate

Based on the overlay plot of the responses using a simple lattice design for process optimization, Anchomanes starch succinate produced from the combined effect of purified Anchomanes starch of 88.81% and succinic anhydride of 11.19% gave the best mixing combination for producing high-quality starch succinate (Table 8) with the desirability of 60% (Fig. 5).

Table 8. Predictive optimal mixing combinations for Anchomonas difformis starch succinates
Parameters 88.81% Starch : 11.19% Succinic anhydride 97.13% Starch : 2.87% Succinic anhydride
Moisture 8.68 10.20
Fat 0.99 1.06
Protein 3.62 3.85
Ash 0.97 1.01
Crude fibre 0.91 0.95
Carbohydrate 86.35 79.90
Water absorption capacity 260.60 232.379
Oil absorption capacity 161.00 146.15
Swelling capaity 3.74 3.74
Bulk density 0.62 0.58
Solubilty 1.75 1.35
Gelatilization 85.76 74.06
Peak 250.35 269.18
Trough 106.51 110.32
Breakdown 143.85 158.86
Final 151.50 167.15
Setback 45.09 56.60
Time 4.32 4.44
Pasting 75.13 75.12
Amylose 13.03 16.53
Amlopectin 86.97 83.47
Saponin 0.90 0.77
Oxalate 0.27 0.23
Tanin 0.23 0.28
Phytate 0.37 0.21
Desirability 0.60 0.45
Status Selected
Download Excel Table

4. Conclusions

The results revealed that the level of succinylation significantly influenced the Anchomanes difformis starch quality determinants. For the correlation loading results, the predominant principal component of the quality determinants showed a positive correlation with bulk density, gelatinization temperature, and all proximate and pasting properties except carbohydrate, peak viscosity, and breakdown viscosity, but negatively correlated with water absorption and oil absorption capacities, swelling capacity, peak viscosity, breakdown viscosity, and tannin content. However, the preference for the starch samples succinylated at 12% might be attributed to the high carbohydrate content, high swelling index, low tannin content, low peak viscosity, and low breakdown viscosity. Conclusively, the overlay plot of the responses using a simple lattice design for process optimization revealed that Anchomanes starch succinate produced from the combined effect of purified Anchomanes starch of 88.81% and succinic anhydride of 11.19% would give the high-quality Anchomanes difformis starch succinate.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Mrs. K. Ajao for her technical assistance and moral support.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Raji AO, Aruna TE. Methodology: Raji AO, Aruna TE. Formal analysis: Aruna TE. Validation: Sani M, Osunrinade OA. Data curation: Raji AO, Sani M. Writing - original draft: Raji AO, Sani M. Writing - review & editing: Raji AO, Osunrinade OA.

Ethics approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

Funding

This research work was funded by Tetfund for Institutional Based Research, Nigeria.

ORCID

Akeem Olayemi Raji (First & Corresponding author) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4805-4943

Tawakalitu Eniola Aruna https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2566-2380

Maimuna Sani https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0883-386x

Oludolapo Akinyemi Osunrinade https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4534-3798

References

1.

Abe TO, Lajide L. Characterization of starch from hot water treated and untreated Achomanes difformis rhizome. IOSR J Appl Chem. 7:50-57 2014;

2.

Adegunwa MO, Adeniyi OD, Adebowale AA, Bakare HA. Quality evaluation of kokoro produced from maize-pigeon pea flour blends. J Culin Sci Technol. 13:200-213 2015;

3.

Adejumo AL, Aderibigbe FA, Owolabi RU. Comparative studies of starch susceptibilities to α-amylase degradation of different cereal and root crops of Nigeria. African J Biotechnol. 12:4663-4669 2013;

4.

Adewale P, Yancheshmeh MS, Lam E. Starch modification for non-food, industrial applications: Market intelligence and critical review. Carbohydr Polym. 291:119590 2022;

5.

Adewumi CN, Achugasim O, Ogali RE, Akaranta O. Physicochemical characterization of starch from unripe artocarpus heterophyllus lam pulp as a low-cost starch source for oilfield applications. In: SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and ExhibitionD033S027R008 2019

6.

Afolayan M, Joyce O, David BM. Extraction, isolation, physicochemical characterization, phytochemical and proximate evaluation of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) starch. World J Adv Res Rev. 8:019-025 2020;

7.

Afolayan M, Olajide , Enemali I. Isolation and characterization studies of Dioscorea dregeana (Kunth) root starch as a potential pharmaceutical and industrial biomaterial. Direct Res J Chem Mater Sci. 8:20-26 2021; .

8.

Ahmad M, Rukhsaar S, Gani A, Ashwar BA, Wani TA, Shah U, Jhan F. Recent advances in the application of starch and resistant starch and slowly digestible starch. In: Food Biopolymers: Structural, Functional and Nutraceutical Properties. In: Gani A, Ashwar BA, editors.EditorsSpringer Nature. Newyork, USA: p p. 59-90 2021;

9.

Amoo ARN, Dufie WMF, Ibok O. Physicochemical and pasting properties of starch extracted from four yam varieties. J Food Nutr Sci. 2:262-269 2014;

10.

AOAC Official Method of Analysis.18th edAssociation of Officiating Analytical Chemists. Washington DC, USA: 2005.

11.

Arueya GL, Oyewale TM. Effect of varying degrees of succinylation on the functional and morphological properties of starch from acha (Digitaria exilis Kippis Stapf). Food Chem. 177:258-266 2015;

12.

Awokoya KN, Nwokocha LM, Moronkola BA, Moronkola DO. Studies on the isolation, structural and functional properties of starch succinate of Cocoyam (Colocasia antiquorum). Der Chem Sin. 2:228-244 2011; .

13.

Awoyale W, Maziya-Dixon B, Sanni LO, Shittu TA. Effect of water yam (Dioscoreaalata) flour fortified with distiller’s spent grain on nutritional, chemical, and functional properties. Food Sci Nutr. 4:24-33 2016;

14.

Awoyale W, Oyedele H, Maziya-Dixon B. The functional and pasting properties of unripe plantain flour, and the sensory attributes of the cooked paste (amala) as affected by packaging materials and storage periods. Cogent Food Agric. 6:1823595 2020;

15.

Badejo AA, Osunlakin AP, Famakinwa A, Idowu AO, Fagbemi TN. Analyses of dietary fibre contents, antioxidant composition, functional and pasting properties of plantain and Moringa oleifera composite flour blends. Cogent Food Agric. 3:1278871 2017;

16.

Chakraborty INP, Mal SS, Paul UC, Rahman MH, Mazumder N. An insight into the gelatinization properties influencing the modified starches used in food industry: A review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 15:1195-1223 2022;

17.

Croat TB, Ortiz OO. Distribution of Araceae and the diversity of life forms. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 89:8939 2020;

18.

Diyana ZN, Jumaidin R, Selamat MZ, Ghazali I, Julmohammad N, Huda N, Ilyas RA. Physical properties of thermoplastic starch derived from natural resources and its blends: A review. Polymers. 13:1396 2021;

19.

Edima-Nyah AP, Ntukidem VE, James EI. Development and quality assessment of breakfast cereals from blends of whole yellow maize (Zea mays), soybean (Glycine max) and unripe Banana (Musa sapientum). Asian J Agric Food Sci. 7:85-94 2019;

20.

Elekofehinti OO, Iwaloye O, Olawale F, Ariyo EO. Saponins in cancer treatment: Current progress and future prospects. Pathophysiology. 28:250-272 2021;

21.

Emeje M, Kalita R, Isimi C, Buragohain A, Kunle O, Ofoefule S. Synthesis, physicochemical characterization, and functional properties of an esterified starch from an underutilized source in Nigeria. African J Food Agric Nutr Dev. 12:2001-2018 2012;

22.

Eom SH, Lee MS, Lee EW, Kim YM, Kim TH. Pancreatic lipase inhibitory activity of phlorotannins isolated from Eisenia bicyclis. Phytother Res. 27:148-151 2013;

23.

Ezeocha CV, Okafor JC. Evaluation of the chemical, functional and pasting properties of starch from trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum) landraces. Eur J Adv Res Biol Life Sci. 4:53-62 2016; .

24.

Falade KO, Oyeyinka SA. Color, chemical and functional properties of plantain cultivars and cooking banana flour as affected by drying method and maturity. J Food Process Preserv. 39:816-828 2015;

25.

Gbenga BL, Olakunle O, Adedayo AM. Influence of pregelatinization on the physicochemical and compressional characteristics of starches obtained from two local varieties of Dioscorea rotundata. IOSR J Pharmacy (IOSR-PHR). 4:24-32 2014;

26.

Gupta RK, Gangoliya SS, Singh NK. Reduction of phytic acid and enhancement of bioavailable micronutrients in food grains. J Food Sci Technol. 52:676-684 2015;

27.

Ijeh I, Ejike CE, Nkwonta OM, Njoku BC. Effect of traditional processing techniques on the nutritional and phytochemical composition of African bread-fruit (Treculia africana) seeds. J Appl Sci Environ Manage. 14:169-173 2010;

28.

Ikegwu OJ, Oledinma NU, Nwbasi VN, Alaka IC. Effect of processing time and some additives on the apparent viscosity of ‘achi’ Brachystegia eurycoma flour. Electronic J Environ Agric Food Chem. 8:685-691 2009; .

29.

Islam SU, Ahmed MB, Ahsan H, Lee YS. Recent molecular mechanisms and beneficial effects of phytochemicals and plant-based whole foods in reducing LDL-C and preventing cardiovascular disease. Antioxidants. 10:784 2021;

30.

Jyothi AN, Sajeev MS, Parvathy PC, Sreekumar J. Optimization of synthesis and characterization of cassava starch-graft-poly (acrylonitrile) using response surface methodology. J Appl Polym Sci. 122:1546-1555 2011;

31.

Kaushik S, Cuervo AM. The coming of age of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 19:365-381 2018;

32.

Klunklin W, Savage G. Physicochemical, antioxidant properties and in vitro digestibility of wheat-purple rice flour mixtures. Int J Food Sci Technol. 53:1962-1971 2018;

33.

Kwon GI, Apostolidis E, Shetty K. Inhibitory potential of wine and tea against α-amylase and α-glucosidase for management of hyperglycemia linked to type 2 diabetes. J Food Biochem. 32:15-31 (2008;

34.

Lawal OS, Adebowale KO. Physicochemical characteristics and thermal properties of chemically modified jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis) starch. Carbohydr Polym. 60:331-341 2005;

35.

Macabeo APG, Krohn K, Gehle D, Read RW, Brophy JJ, Cordell GA, Franzblau SG, Aguinaldo AM. Indole alkaloids from the leaves of Philippine Alstonia scholaris. Phytochem. 66:1158-1162 2005;

36.

Majhi S, Tyagi A, Mishra A. Bio-polymeric packaging material for packaging of raw food. Ref Mod Mater Sci Mat Eng. :1-8 2019;

37.

Marcazzan M, Vianello F, Scarpa M, Rigo A. An ESR assay for α-amylase activity toward succinylated starch, amylose and amylopectin. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 38:191-202 1999;

38.

Mayer FD, Gasparotto JM, Klauck E, Werle LB, Jahn SL, Hoffmann R, Mazutti MA. Conversion of cassava starch to ethanol and a byproduct under different hydrolysis conditions. Starch-Stärke. 67:620-628 2015;

39.

Morrison WR, Laignelet B. An improved colorimetric procedure for determining apparent and total amylose in cereal and other starches. J Cereal Sci. 1:9-20 1983;

40.

Olumurewa JAV, Ibidapo PO, Adebileje JF. Evaluation of functional and pasting properties of instant pounded yam/plantain flour. Advances in Obesity, Weight Management and Control. 9:1-6 2019;

41.

Olu-Owolabi BI, Olayinka OO, Adegbemile AA, Adebowale KO. Comparison of functional properties between native and chemically modified starches from acha (Digitaria stapf) grains. Food Nutr Sci. 5:222-230 2014;

42.

Oyedele OA, Adeoti O, Adeyanju OO. An investigation into the possibility of producing fuel ethanol from forest anchomanes (Anchomanes Difformis (Bl.) ENGL.). Int J Energy Technol Policy. 10:21-35 2020; .

43.

Oyeyinka SA, Adeloye AA, Smith SA, Adesina BO, Akinwande FF. Physicochemical properties of flour and starch from two cassava varieties. Agrosearch. 19:28-45 2019;

44.

Özden Ö, Sönmez S. Starch usage in paper industry. Res Rev Eng. 2019:207-224 2019; .

45.

Phukan M, Nongkhlaw FT. Starch: An overview of its conventional and unconventional sources, pharmaceutical and industrial applications. Curr Trends Pharm Res. 9:141-161 2022; .

46.

Raji AO, Aruna TE, Afolayan OA, Sanusi SM, Sani M. Influence of fermentation period on the quality of wild yam (Discorea villosa) flour. ASRIC J Agric Sci. 1:9-20 2022; .

47.

Raji AO, Ismael SD, Sani M, Raji MO, Adebayo OF. Value addition and influence of succinylation levels on the quality of wild yam (Discorea villosa) starch. Food Funct. 11:8014-8027 2020;

48.

Reddy NR. Occurrence, distribution, content, and dietary intake of phytate. In: Food Phytates. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL, USA: p p. 41-68 2001; .

49.

Sanful RE, Engmann FN. Physico-chemical and pasting characteristics of flour and starch from aerial yam. American J Food Sci Nutr. 3:1-7 2016; .

50.

Segura-Campos M, Chel-Guerrero L, Betancur-Ancona D. Synthesis and partial characterization of octenylsuccinic starch from Phaseolus lunatus. Food Hydrocoll. 22:1467-1474 2008;

51.

Senanayake SA, Ranaweera KKDS, Bamunuarachchi A, Gunaratne A. Proximate analysis and phytochemical and mineral constituents in four cultivars of yams and tuber crops in Sri Lanka. Trop Agric Res Ext. 15:33-36 2013;

52.

Singh PK, Chudasama H. Evaluating poverty alleviation strategies in a developing country. PloS One. 15:e0227176 2020;

53.

Soetan KO, Oyewole OE. The need for adequate processing to reduce the anti-nutritional factors in plants used as human foods and animal feeds: A review. African J Food Sci. 3:223-232 2009; .

54.

Sorndech W, Tongta S, Blennow A. Slowly digestible-and non-digestible α-glucans: An enzymatic approach to starch modification and nutritional effects. Starch-Stärke. 70:1700145 2018;

55.

Wang X, Leng X, Zhang G. The loosening effect of tea polyphenol on the structure of octenyl succinic anhydride modified waxy maize starch. Food Hydrocoll. 99:105367 2020;

56.

Waterschoot J, Gomand SV, Fierens E, Delcour J. A. Production, structure, physicochemical and functional properties of maize, cassava, wheat, potato and rice starches. Starch-Stärke. 67:14-29 2015;

Food Science and Preservation (FSP) reflected in Scopus

As of January 2024, the journal title has been changed to Food Science and Preservation (FSP).
We are pleased to announce that this has also been reflected in Scopus.
https://www.scopus.com/sourceid/21101210730
We look forward to your interest and submissions to the journal.
Thank you.

 


I don't want to open this window for a day.